Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium (work in progress session)

Discussion of two pre-read papers in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium (work in progress session).

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium (work in progress session).

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

Abstract:  We are valuing beings, beings who possess the capacity to value things. We typically value many things: ideals (e.g., freedom), activities (e.g., doing philosophy), persons (e.g., our friends), states of affairs (e.g., world peace), and even material objects (e.g., works of art). But what is it ‘to value’ something?…

Presentation and Q&A in the “Normativity: Theoretical and Ethical Approaches” Colloquium.

The first session of this semesters research colloquium will be opened by a preread presentation by Leonardo Flamini, who will be speaking on the topic “On the aim of inquiry: Monism, contextualism, and variety”. 

This week’s session will feature a presentation and Q&A by Vincent Grandjean on the topic “Indeterminate Personal Identity”.

For this week’s session, we have our new team member, Claire Field, giving a talk and Q&A on the topic “The Value of Incoherence”. 

For this week’s session featurtes two preread presentations. Alexander Belak will be giving a talk on “Restructuring Understanding’s Object (One Last Time)” and Sebastian Schmidt on “How Evidence Justifies Suspension”. 

The session is postponed to a later date TBA.  This week’s session Jörg Löschke will be giving a talk followed by a Q&A on “Forgiving Benefits”, a collaborative project with Laurent Jaffro.

This week’s session features a talk and Q&A by Kurt Sylvan on the topic “Respect for Truth: A Kantian Account”. 

In this week’s session, Tony Booth will be giving a presentation followed by a Q&A on the topic “The Duty to Understand Others”. 

This week’s research colloquium will feature two preread presentations. First, Xian will be discussing comments on his project titled “When to Believe Against the Evidence”, followed by Atay Kozlovski’s discussion on “Alignment and Explainability in Meaningful Human Control”. 

This week’s session will feature two preread presentations again. Benoit Guilielmo will be discussing comments on his project titled “The Value of Suspension of Judgment”, followed by a discussion on a project by Léna Mudry, topic TBA. 

This week’s session will feature a presentation and Q&A by Glenn Anderau, topic TBA. 

The penultimate session of this semesters research colloquium will feature a talk and Q&A by Thomas Schmidt on the topic “Paradoxes of Supererogation”. 

The opening session of this semester’s research colloquium will feature a presentation by Claire Field titled “Evaluative Injustice?” followed by a Q&A.

(Session has been postponed to Wednesday, 09.10.2024) The fictionalist account of virtual reality (VR) is an anti-realist position, asserting that the things we perceive in VR are not real but fictional. While metaphysically parsimonious, this view raises questions about whether the beliefs of those engaging in VR are coherent and…

Benoit Gaultier will present “Blame, Underperformance, and Personal Weakness” at the third session of this semester’s research colloquium, followed by a Q&A session.

Severin Frohofer will present his paper “Media as an Epistemic Source”, followed by a Q&A. 

Lilith Mace will give a presentation on the topic “Kinds of Doubt”, followed by a Q&A. 

Sebastian Schmidt will give a presentation titled “Doxastic Morality and Epistemic Sociality”. The presentation will be followed by a Q&A. 

Chris Kelp presents a joint paper, co-authored with Miloud Belkoniene, titled “Understanding and Conjunction Closure”, followed by a Q&A. 

Cameron Boult will present a talk titled “Relation-Based Epistemology”, followed by a Q&A session.

This week’s session features a pre-read presentation of a master thesis by Andrin Kohler, titled “Moral Responsibility in Systemic Crises – Beyond Responsibility as Liability”.

This weeks session features two pre-read presentation. The first by Leonardo Flamini titled “From Epistemic States to Duties Not to Enquire”. Followed by a talk by Dominique Kuenzle titled “Dealing with Denials of Normative Motivation”.

In this weeks session Felix Koch will present a talk on the topic “Judgment-Sensitivity and the Control Standard”. 

The last session of this semesters research colloquium features a presentation of a joint paper from Philippe Colo and Léna Mudry titled “The Role of Statistical Evidence in the Formation of Beliefs”.  

Davide dalla Rosa will give a presentation on the topic “A New Approach to Argumentative Conviction”, followed by a Q&A.

In this weeks session Benoit Guilielmo and Celine Müller will present a talk on the topic “Zetetic Engagement with Fiction. The Epistemic Condition of Moral Responsibility”, followed by a Q&A. 

Dario Mortini will give a presentation, on the topic “Hedging and Asserting: a Common Epistemic Norm?”.

Stefan Roski will present a talk titled “Metaphysically Understanding Why”, followed by a Q&A session.

In this weeks session Riccardo di Tommasso will present a talk on the topic “(Intersubjective) Criteria of Truth through a Pluralistic Lens”, followed by a Q&A.

Silvia De Tofoli will give a presentation on the topic “Mathematical Justification without Proof”, followed by a Q&A.

The last session of this semesters research colloquium features a presentation by Zöe Johnson-King titled “Praiseworthy Acting and Praiseworthy Believing”.